Lots No. 1685 v. Town of Defuniak Springs

174 So. 29, 127 Fla. 348
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 10, 1937·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice ELLIS and Mr. Justice BROWN and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the Decree of the Circuit Court should be reversed for further appropriate proceedings while Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice DAVIS are of the opinion that the Decree should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the said Decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton, v. McClung, *Page 350 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the Decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

ELLIS, C.J., and WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and DAVIS, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lots No. 1685 v. Town of Defuniak Springs, 174 So. 29, 127 Fla. 348 (Fla. 1937).

174 So. 29 (Lots No. 1685 v. Town of Defuniak Springs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Treasure Island v. Strong
215 So. 2d 473 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)
City of Treasure Island v. Strong
206 So. 2d 269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Bricklayers, Masons, Plasterers Union No. 3 v. Acme Tile & Terrazzo Co.
112 So. 2d 43 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Scott v. Scott
30 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1947)
Williams v. City of Fernandina
189 So. 830 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)