Sawyer v. Town of Mount Dora

148 So. 209, 146 So. 563, 108 Fla. 456
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 24, 1933·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In these three cases' the Court below overruled motions to dismiss three several bills of complaint brought by the Town of Mount Dora to foreclose certain paving assessments made by the city under authority of Chapter 9298, Acts of 1923, Laws of Florida:. The appeals are taken from the interlocutory orders made denying the several motions' to dismiss. We have consolidated the appeals here in order to dispose of them in one' opinion.

An examination of the several transcripts discloses that the decrees appealed' from must be affirmed upon the authority of Davant v. City of' Brooksville, 107 Fla. 292, 144 Sou. Rep. 666, where a bill of complaint, in substance similar to those here involved, was held good as against a demurrer.

Orders appealed from affirmed in each case.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sawyer v. Town of Mount Dora, 148 So. 209, 146 So. 563, 108 Fla. 456 (Fla. 1933).

148 So. 209 (Sawyer v. Town of Mount Dora) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Finlayson, Et Vir v. Town of Monticello
189 So. 21 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Lots No. 1685 v. Town of Defuniak Springs
174 So. 29 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Boatright v. City of Jacksonville
158 So. 42 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Riverside Park Co. v. City of Titusville
151 So. 382 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)