Lora v. Hollenhorst

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7658

WILFREDO GONZALEZ LORA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS M. HOLLENHORST, Official Capacity; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK, Official Capacity; TIMOTHY MCGRATH, Official Capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-05-738-1)

Submitted: July 28, 2006 Decided: August 16, 2006

Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court’s

orders denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v.

Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388

(1971), and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Lora v. Hollenhorst, No.

CA-05-738-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 5, 2005 & entered July 6, 2005;

filed Aug. 1, 2005 & entered Aug. 2, 2005). We deny Lora’s motion

to consolidate and dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -