Lora v. Hollenhorst

Fourth Circuit

Lora v. Hollenhorst

195 F. App'x 188

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 24, 2006·No. 05-1692·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), in which he sought reconsideration of the court’s prior order dismissing his breach of contract action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lora v. Hollenhorst, No. CA-03-449-1 (E.D. Va. filed May 24, 2005 & entered May 25, 2005). We deny Lora’s motion to consolidate and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), in which he sought reconsideration of the court’s prior order dismissing his breach of contract action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lora v. Hollenhorst, No. CA-03-449-1 (E.D. Va. filed May 24, 2005 & entered May 25, 2005). We deny Lora’s motion to consolidate and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Lora v. Hollenhorst, 195 F. App'x 188 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

195 F. App'x 188 (Lora v. Hollenhorst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.