Lora v. Hollenhorst

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: September 1, 2004
• Docket: 04-1184
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1184

WILFREDO GONZALEZ LORA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS M. HOLLENHORST, Assistant United States Attorney, personal and official capacity; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK, Special Assistant United States Attorney, official and personal capacity; EUGENE ROSSI, Special Assistant United States Attorney; TIMOTHY MCGRATH, Special Agent for the Drug Enforcement Administration, official and personal capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-03-449-AM)

Submitted: August 26, 2004 Decided: September 1, 2004

Before WIDENER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court’s

orders dismissing his breach of contract action pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 12(b)(1), and denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ.

P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Lora v. Hollenhorst, No. CA-03-449-AM (E.D. Va. filed

Oct. 28, 2003 & entered Oct. 29, 2003; filed Nov. 17, 2003 &

entered Nov. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -