Lora v. Hollenhorst

Fourth Circuit

Lora v. Hollenhorst

108 F. App'x 101

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 1, 2004·No. No. 04-1184·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his breach of contract action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), and denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lora v. Hollenhorst, No. CA-03-449-AM (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 28, 2003 & entered Oct. 29, 2003; filed Nov. 17, 2003 & entered Nov. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his breach of contract action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), and denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lora v. Hollenhorst, No. CA-03-449-AM (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 28, 2003 & entered Oct. 29, 2003; filed Nov. 17, 2003 & entered Nov. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Lora v. Hollenhorst, 108 F. App'x 101 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

108 F. App'x 101 (Lora v. Hollenhorst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.