Long v. State

1920 OK CR 179, 192 P. 428, 17 Okla. Crim. 739, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 158
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Long v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 Okla. Crim. 672
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided October 2, 1920·No. No. A-3378.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM..

Plaintiff in error, E. L. Long, was convicted of having on the 9th day of October, 1917, intoxicating liquors in his possession with the intent to sell the same and alleging said offense to be the second offense, said defendant having been convicted in the county court of Tulsa county on the 11th day of May, 1917, of the same offense. Prom the judgment rendered on the verdict he appeals. This is a companion case of Long v. State, 17 Okla. Cr.-, 192 Pac. 427. this day decided. The Attorney General has filed a confession of error based on the same exceptions, and the judgment must be reversed on the authority of McAlester v. State, 16 Okl. Cr. 70, 180 Pac. 718.

Accordingly the judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Long v. State, 1920 OK CR 179, 192 P. 428, 17 Okla. Crim. 739, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 158 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

1920 OK CR 179 (Long v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Long v. State
1920 OK CR 178 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1920)
McAlester v. State
1919 OK CR 158 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1919)