Long v. State
This text of 1920 OK CR 179 (Long v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff in error, E. L. Long, was convicted of having on the 9th day of October, 1917, intoxicating liquors in his possession with the intent to sell the same and alleging said offense to be the second offense, said defendant having been convicted in the county court of Tulsa county on the 11th day of May, 1917, of the same offense. Prom the judgment rendered on the verdict he appeals. This is a companion case of Long v. State, 17 Okla. Cr.-, 192 Pac. 427. this day decided. The Attorney General has filed a confession of error based on the same exceptions, and the judgment must be reversed on the authority of McAlester v. State, 16 Okl. Cr. 70, 180 Pac. 718.
Accordingly the judgment is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1920 OK CR 179, 192 P. 428, 17 Okla. Crim. 739, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-state-oklacrimapp-1920.