Long v. State

1919 OK CR 76, 179 P. 478, 15 Okla. Crim. 677, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 77
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedApril 4, 1919
DocketNo. A-3134.
StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 76 (Long v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Long v. State, 1919 OK CR 76, 179 P. 478, 15 Okla. Crim. 677, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 77 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error, E. L. Long, F. J. Norris, and W. H. Mosby were jointly tried and convicted on an information charging that they did have possession of “thirty-eight half pints of whisky, one quart of whisky, two gallons and ten half-pints of alcohol, and one quart of wine.”

In accordance with the verdicts the court sentenced E. L. Long to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $400, and F. J. Norris and W. H. Mosby to each pay a fine of $50 and to be confined in the county jail for 30.days.

*678 From the judgments tendered on the verdicts an aopeal was perfected. No lirief had been filed, and no appearance made when the case was called for final submission.

An examination of the record discloses that the information is sufficient; that the evidence for the state supports its allegations, and that no evidence was offered on behalf of the plaintiffs in error.

The judgments appealed from are affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1919 OK CR 76, 179 P. 478, 15 Okla. Crim. 677, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/long-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.