Lloyd Stout v. Sheriff, George A. Broom

Fifth Circuit

Lloyd Stout v. Sheriff, George A. Broom

406 F.2d 758

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 1, 1969

Docket26768

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 406 F.2d 758 (Lloyd Stout v. Sheriff, George A. Broom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lloyd Stout v. Sheriff, George A. Broom, 406 F.2d 758 (5th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

In this pro se case, appellant has failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and it is therefore appropriate to dispose of this case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(c) (2). The appellant, haxing escaped from an Alabama state prison was apprehended in the State of Louisiana. He sought to avoid extradition to Alabama by filing a petition for habeas corpus in federal court.

After a full evidentiary hearing, the district court denied relief. The court held, in a well-considered memorandum order, that the extradition proceedings in Louisiana state court were valid, and that the appellant was not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus. We agree.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In this pro se case, appellant has failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and it is therefore appropriate to dispose of this case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(c) (2). The appellant, haxing escaped from an Alabama state prison was apprehended in the State of Louisiana. He sought to avoid extradition to Alabama by filing a petition for habeas corpus in federal court.

After a full evidentiary hearing, the district court denied relief. The court held, in a well-considered memorandum order, that the extradition proceedings in Louisiana state court were valid, and that the appellant was not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus. We agree.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

406 F.2d 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-stout-v-sheriff-george-a-broom-ca5-1969.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack