Charles R. Wren, Jr. v. S. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State Prison

410 F.2d 390, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12514
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 6, 1969·No. 27045·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this pro se case appellants have failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, F.R.A.P., and it is therefore appropriate to dispose of this case summarily pursuant to Rule 9(c) (2) of this Court. Stout v. Broom, 5 Cir. 1969, 406 F.2d 758.

The appellants are prisoners in the Georgia State Penitentiary at Reidsville *391 who petitioned the district court for an injunction to block desegregation of prison facilities. The integration had been ordered by a three-judge district court. See Wilson et al. v. Kelley, N.D.Ga.1968, 294 F.Supp. 1005.

Injunctive relief was denied below on grounds that Wilson was a proper class action under Rule 23(b) (1), F.R. Civ.P., and appellants, being within the class designated as plaintiffs in that action, are bound by that decision. Rule 23(c) (3), F.R.Civ.P. The district court was correct in its interpretation of the rule. The judgment below is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles R. Wren, Jr. v. S. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State Prison, 410 F.2d 390, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12514 (5th Cir. 1969).

410 F.2d 390 (Charles R. Wren, Jr. v. S. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State Prison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related