Lithgow v. Keyser

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 22, 2021·No. 1:21-cv-00998·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Plaintiff, 21 CIVIL 998 (AJN) -V- JUDGMENT Keyser, Defendant.

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated October 22, 2021, The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Aaron’s Report and Recommendation and finds no error. Petitioner’s general objection to the Report and Recommendation was untimely, and even if it was not untimely, the Court’s de novo review of the objected-to portions of the Report & Recommendation reveals no basis for rejecting or modifying it. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety, and the Petition is denied. The Court also finds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and in forma pauperis status is therefore denied for purposes of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Dated: New York, New York October 22, 2021 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Cour#/// BY: D _*) - Down) he □

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lithgow v. Keyser, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Lithgow v. Keyser (Lithgow v. Keyser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)