Lineberger v. York

81 F. App'x 460
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 25, 2003·No. No. 03-6456·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Jeffrey Bernard Lineberger seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lineberger has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lineberger v. York, 81 F. App'x 460 (4th Cir. 2003).

81 F. App'x 460 (Lineberger v. York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lineberger v. North Carolina Department of Correction
657 S.E.2d 673 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)