Lineberger v. York

76 F. App'x 497
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 24, 2003·No. 03-6771·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Bernard Lineberger appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lineberger v. York, No. CA-02-210-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lineberger v. York, 76 F. App'x 497 (4th Cir. 2003).

76 F. App'x 497 (Lineberger v. York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lineberger v. North Carolina Department of Correction
657 S.E.2d 673 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)