Linder v. Cole Bros. Lightning-Rod Co.
This text of 72 S.E. 719 (Linder v. Cole Bros. Lightning-Rod Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The lightning-rod company sued Linder for the purchase-price of about 200 feet of lightning-rod, which had been ordered under a written contract stating that it was not subject to countermand, except by mutual consent. The petition alleged delivery. The plea set up that, though the defendant had signed the contract, he had never accepted any of the lightning-rods from the plaintiff, and had renounced the contract, for that, within a few hours after the contract was made, and before the plaintiff had been put to any expense or trouble whatever, or had undertaken to fill the order, he had canceled it, and had told the plaintiff that he would not take the rods, and had directed the plaintiff not to ship them. He denied that delivery had been made. On this state of facts, the case is controlled by Black v. Kaplan, 9 Ga. App. 811 (72 S. E. 303); Rounsaville v. Leonard Co., 127 Ga. 735 (6), (56 S. E. 1030); and Oklahoma Vinegar Co. v. Carter, 116 Ga. 140 (42 S. E. 378, 59 L. R. A. 122, 94 Am. St. R. 112).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 S.E. 719, 10 Ga. App. 102, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linder-v-cole-bros-lightning-rod-co-gactapp-1911.