Bixler v. Poulas

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bixler v. Poulas

99 S.E. 138, 23 Ga. App. 633, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 246

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 19, 1919

Docket10056

StatusPublished

This text of 99 S.E. 138 (Bixler v. Poulas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bixler v. Poulas, 99 S.E. 138, 23 Ga. App. 633, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 246 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. Where a contract 'of purchase and sale of goods was executory on both sides, notice by the purchaser to the seller to cancel the purchaser’s order for the goods was a breach of the contract, and thereafter the seller could not by an attempt to deliver the goods treat the contract as performed on his part, and sue the purchaser for the full purchase price. See Linder v. Cole Brothers Lightning Rod Co., 10 Ga. App. 102 (72 S. E. 719), and cases there cited.

2. The undisputed evidence shows that the order was cancelled by the purchaser several days before the seller undertook to deliver the goods ordered. Upon the evidence the court did not err in directing a verdict for the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI