Linda Evans v. Forsyth County Board of Education

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 28, 2016
DocketA17D0173
StatusPublished

This text of Linda Evans v. Forsyth County Board of Education (Linda Evans v. Forsyth County Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Linda Evans v. Forsyth County Board of Education, (Ga. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 13, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0173. LINDA EVANS v. FORSYTH COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION.

Linda Evans was injured on the job in 2013, and her employer, the Forsyth County Board of Education, accepted her injury as compensable and began paying benefits. Later, the County sought a hearing to determine several issues. Pending the hearing, which has not yet been held, the parties engaged in discovery. The County requested a protective order to prevent the disclosure of certain evidence, and an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) for the State Board of Workers’ Compensation granted the request. Evans appealed, and the Board’s appellate division adopted in part and amended in part the ALJ’s order. Evans then appealed to the superior court, which dismissed the appeal on the ground that only final orders or judgments in workers’ compensation cases may be judicially reviewed. Evans now seeks discretionary review in this Court. “Only a final award, order, judgment or decision of the Appellate Division is subject to appeal to the superior court.” Strickland v. Crossmark, 298 Ga. App. 568, 570 (1) (680 SE2d 606) (2009) (punctuation omitted); see also OCGA § 34-9-105 (b). A final award is “one which grants or denies compensation.” Conwood Corp. v. Guinn, 190 Ga. App. 595, 595 (379 SE2d 621) (1989) (punctuation omitted). Nothing in the workers’ compensation scheme permits an interlocutory appeal. See Strickland, supra. The order at issue here was an interlocutory discovery order, not a final workers’ compensation award. Because the superior court did not address a final workers’ compensation award, this application presents nothing for review. It is therefore DISMISSED as premature. See Gilman Paper Co. v. Davis, 230 Ga. App. 364 (496 SE2d 469) (1998).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 12/13/2016 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CONWOOD CORPORATION v. Guinn
379 S.E.2d 621 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Strickland v. Crossmark, Inc.
680 S.E.2d 606 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)
Gilman Paper Co. v. Davis
496 S.E.2d 469 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Linda Evans v. Forsyth County Board of Education, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linda-evans-v-forsyth-county-board-of-education-gactapp-2016.