Limerick v. Roberts

124 S.E. 806, 32 Ga. App. 755, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 632
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 7, 1924
Docket15407
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 124 S.E. 806 (Limerick v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Limerick v. Roberts, 124 S.E. 806, 32 Ga. App. 755, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 632 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. Under the particular facts of this ease, and in the light of the entire charge, the court did not' err, for any reason assigned, in instructing the jury as follows:

(а) “Now there is no question in this case as to any negligence on the part of Mr. Roberts [the plaintiff]. Nobody contends or can contend ■ under the evidence in this case that he was negligent.”

(б) “I charge you further that if a servant or employee, while engaged in the business of his master, makes a slight deviation for ends of his own, the master remains liable when the’ act was so closely connected with the master’s affairs that, though the servant may derive some " benefit from it, it may nevertheless fairly be regarded as within the course of his employment.” See Ryne v. Liebers Farm Equipment Co., 107 Neb. 454, 460 (186 N. W. 358), and citations; Dowdell v. Beasley, 205 Ala. 130 (3) (87 So. 18); Fisick v. Lorber, 159 N. Y. Supp. 722 (2) (19 Misc. 574); Gibson v. Dupree, 26 Col. App. 324 (2) (144 Pac. 1133); Devine v. Ward Baking Co., 188 Ill. App. 590 (2); Jessen v. Peterson, 18 Cal. App. 349 (123 Pac. 219); Brimberry v. Dudfield Lumber Co., 183 Cal. 454 (2) (191 Pac. 894).

2. There is evidence to support the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. Seabroolc & Kennedy, K. A. McWhorter, for plaintiff in error,

[757]*757cited: 6 Ga. App. 470, 472; 3 Ga. App. 50; 139 Ga. 512; 19 Ga. App. 799; 20 Ga. App. 242; 59 N. E. 238; 50 N. E. 500; 144 Pac. 1123; 181 N. Y. Supp. 573; 157 N. W. 753; 210 S. W. 167; 159 N. W. 316; 71 Atl. 535; 183 Pac. 295; 9 Ga. App. 327.

Gonnerat & Hunter, contra,

cited: 63 Conn. 155 (28 Atl. 29, 27 L. R. A. 161); Berry on Automobiles (3d ed.), § 1088; 205 Ala. 130 (87 So. 18); 26 Colo. App. 324 (144 Pac. 1133); 159 N. Y. Supp. 722; 232 Mass. 576 (122 N. E. 743); 107 Neb. 454 (186 N. W. 358); 260 Pa. 466 (103 Atl. 882); 91 Wash. 637 (158 Pac. 529); 244 Pa. 172 (90 Atl. 528); 207 Mo. App. 137 (231 S. W. 277); Civil Code, § 4413, 6 Ga. App. 470 (distinguished).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coe v. Carroll & Carroll, Inc.
709 S.E.2d 324 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2011)
Sanders v. Brown
343 S.E.2d 722 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Davis Gas Co. v. Powell
232 S.E.2d 258 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Davis v. Childers
215 S.E.2d 297 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Harnage v. Hall
169 S.E.2d 345 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Marketing Sales Industries of Georgia, Inc. v. Roberts
165 S.E.2d 319 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Doster v. C. v. Nalley, Inc.
99 S.E.2d 432 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Cooley v. Tate
73 S.E.2d 72 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Davidson v. Harris Inc.
54 S.E.2d 290 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
MacOn Dairies Inc. v. Duhart
24 S.E.2d 732 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Shipp v. Georgia Power Co.
21 S.E.2d 458 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Exposition Cotton Mills v. Crawford
19 S.E.2d 835 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Parker v. Smith
18 S.E.2d 559 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Andrews v. Norvell
15 S.E.2d 808 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Jump v. Anderson
197 S.E. 644 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Causey v. Swift & Co.
196 S.E. 228 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Marsh v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.
189 S.E. 550 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Gomez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
172 S.E. 750 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Dawson Chevrolet Co. v. Ford
170 S.E. 306 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Selman v. Wallace
165 S.E. 851 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 S.E. 806, 32 Ga. App. 755, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/limerick-v-roberts-gactapp-1924.