Lewis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lewis v. State

540 S.W.3d 888

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 6, 2018·No. ED 105167·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James W. Lewis appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo. App. E.D. 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the *889decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James W. Lewis appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo. App. E.D. 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the *889decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Lewis v. State, 540 S.W.3d 888 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

540 S.W.3d 888 (Lewis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related