Lewis v. State

540 S.W.3d 888
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 6, 2018
DocketED 105167
StatusPublished

This text of 540 S.W.3d 888 (Lewis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lewis v. State, 540 S.W.3d 888 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James W. Lewis appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the motion court denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo. App. E.D. 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the *889decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burston v. State
343 S.W.3d 691 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
540 S.W.3d 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-state-moctapp-2018.