Lewis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lewis v. State

491 S.W.3d 665, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 566, 2016 WL 3180193

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 7, 2016·No. No. ED 103149·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Justin Lewis appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion without' an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Justin Lewis appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion without' an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Lewis v. State, 491 S.W.3d 665, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 566, 2016 WL 3180193 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

491 S.W.3d 665 (Lewis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.