Lewis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lewis v. State

577 S.W.3d 176

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 18, 2019·No. No. ED 106623·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James W. Lewis ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief and finding that Movant failed to demonstrate that his plea counsel was ineffective. Finding that the motion court did not clearly err, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James W. Lewis ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief and finding that Movant failed to demonstrate that his plea counsel was ineffective. Finding that the motion court did not clearly err, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Lewis v. State, 577 S.W.3d 176 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

577 S.W.3d 176 (Lewis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.