Lewis Et Al. v. Reynolds, Collector of Internal Revenue

Supreme Court

Lewis Et Al. v. Reynolds, Collector of Internal Revenue

284 U.S. 599, 52 S. Ct. 264

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 15, 1932·No. 115·Published·Cited by 51 cases

Opinion

In this cause it is ordered that the following words be deleted from the sixth paragraph of the opinion (ante, pp. 282, 283):

“Also that at the timé of his. last .decision he was restricted to consideration of the demand for refund and determination of whether the trustees were entitled to deduct the state inheritance taxes.”

Otherwise the opinion will stand as heretofore announced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this cause it is ordered that the following words be deleted from the sixth paragraph of the opinion (ante, pp. 282, 283):

“Also that at the timé of his. last .decision he was restricted to consideration of the demand for refund and determination of whether the trustees were entitled to deduct the state inheritance taxes.”

Otherwise the opinion will stand as heretofore announced.

Lewis Et Al. v. Reynolds, Collector of Internal Revenue, 284 U.S. 599, 52 S. Ct. 264 (1932).

Pincite

284 U.S. 599 (Lewis Et Al. v. Reynolds, Collector of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related