Lester v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lester v. State

685 So. 2d 1033, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 109, 1997 WL 7170

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 10, 1997

DocketNo. 96-2946

StatusPublished

This text of 685 So. 2d 1033 (Lester v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lester v. State, 685 So. 2d 1033, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 109, 1997 WL 7170 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The summary denial of Lester’s Rule 3.850 motion is affirmed because he failed to set forth sufficient facts entitling him to relief. This affirmance is without prejudice to file an amended motion alleging that Lester was convicted in federal court and that his federal [1034]*1034sentence was not imposed concurrent to his state sentence, should that be the case.

AFFIRMED.

COBB, GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The summary denial of Lester’s Rule 3.850 motion is affirmed because he failed to set forth sufficient facts entitling him to relief. This affirmance is without prejudice to file an amended motion alleging that Lester was convicted in federal court and that his federal [1034]*1034sentence was not imposed concurrent to his state sentence, should that be the case.

AFFIRMED.

COBB, GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

685 So. 2d 1033, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 109, 1997 WL 7170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lester-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.