Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lester v. State

Lester v. State

685 So. 2d 1033, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 109, 1997 WL 7170
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lester v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 737 So. 2d 1149 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 10, 1997·No. No. 96-2946·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The summary denial of Lester’s Rule 3.850 motion is affirmed because he failed to set forth sufficient facts entitling him to relief. This affirmance is without prejudice to file an amended motion alleging that Lester was convicted in federal court and that his federal [1034]*1034sentence was not imposed concurrent to his state sentence, should that be the case.

AFFIRMED.

COBB, GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lester v. State, 685 So. 2d 1033, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 109, 1997 WL 7170 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

685 So. 2d 1033 (Lester v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.