Lepping v. HAMMERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

252 N.W.2d 580, 312 Minn. 376, 1977 Minn. LEXIS 1608
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided March 18, 1977·No. 46105·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Relators seek review of a unanimous decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board (now the Worker’s Compensation Court of Appeals) reversing the compensation judge’s finding as to causation and awarding the employee benefits for temporary [377] total disability and medical expenses. The issue raised on appeal is whether there is substantial evidence to support the finding that the employee’s disabling condition, optic neuritis, was causally related to his employment.

A review of the record reveals that the board had before it credible evidence that the employee’s disability was causally related to his employment. Findings of the board upon questions of fact will not be disturbed unless they are manifestly contrary to the evidence. Grgurich v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 301 Minn. 291, 223 N. W. 2d 120 (1974).

Respondent is allowed $350 attorneys fees.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lepping v. HAMMERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 252 N.W.2d 580, 312 Minn. 376, 1977 Minn. LEXIS 1608 (Mich. 1977).

252 N.W.2d 580 (Lepping v. HAMMERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paulson v. Ceco Corp.
265 N.W.2d 647 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1978)
Lepping v. HAMMERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
252 N.W.2d 580 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1977)