Lee v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lee v. State

912 S.W.2d 591, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1771, 1995 WL 619260

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 24, 1995·No. No. WD 50567·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rickey Lee appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. He asserts that his guilty pleas to charges of murder in the second degree and armed criminal action were involuntary and the court did not have a sufficient basis in fact to find him guilty. We disagree and affirm. Discerning no jurisprudential value to publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rickey Lee appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. He asserts that his guilty pleas to charges of murder in the second degree and armed criminal action were involuntary and the court did not have a sufficient basis in fact to find him guilty. We disagree and affirm. Discerning no jurisprudential value to publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order. Rule 84.16(b).

Lee v. State, 912 S.W.2d 591, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1771, 1995 WL 619260 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

912 S.W.2d 591 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related