Lee v. State
877 S.W.2d 719, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1030, 1994 WL 270474
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lee v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1771 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Randy Kevin Lee, appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court dismissed the motion because it was not timely filed under Rule 24.035(b).
No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee v. State, 877 S.W.2d 719, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1030, 1994 WL 270474 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
877 S.W.2d 719 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.