Lee v. State
980 S.W.2d 136, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1810, 1998 WL 730752
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lee v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1771 →
Opinion
ORDER
Sean Lee (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. After reviewing the briefs and the record on appeal, we conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee v. State, 980 S.W.2d 136, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1810, 1998 WL 730752 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).
980 S.W.2d 136 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.