Lee v. State
637 So. 2d 391, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5880, 1994 WL 261363
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 15, 1994·No. No. 94-1447·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm the order of the trial court granting in part and denying in part the relief appellant sought in his unsworn motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). This is without prejudice to appellant raising his claim of breach of the plea agreement in a properly sworn motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee v. State, 637 So. 2d 391, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5880, 1994 WL 261363 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
637 So. 2d 391 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bautz v. State
932 So. 2d 465 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Catlin v. State
929 So. 2d 1087 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)