Bautz v. State
932 So. 2d 465, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8578, 2006 WL 1470130
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 2006·No. No. 4D06-1790·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The denial of Bautz’s rule 3.800 motion to correct sentence is affirmed without prejudice. Bautz may raise the claim of a violation of the plea agreement in a timely and legally sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Catlin v. State, 929 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Lee v. State, 637 So.2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bautz v. State, 932 So. 2d 465, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8578, 2006 WL 1470130 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
932 So. 2d 465 (Bautz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eason v. State
932 So. 2d 465 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)