Bautz v. State
932 So. 2d 465, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8578, 2006 WL 1470130
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 31, 2006
DocketNo. 4D06-1790
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 932 So. 2d 465 (Bautz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bautz v. State, 932 So. 2d 465, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8578, 2006 WL 1470130 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
Opinion
The denial of Bautz’s rule 3.800 motion to correct sentence is affirmed without prejudice. Bautz may raise the claim of a violation of the plea agreement in a timely and legally sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Catlin v. State, 929 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Lee v. State, 637 So.2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Eason v. State
932 So. 2d 465 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
932 So. 2d 465, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8578, 2006 WL 1470130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bautz-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.