Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/BAUTZ v. State

BAUTZ v. State

940 So. 2d 1201, 2006 WL 3018002
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in BAUTZ v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8578 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 25, 2006·No. 4D06-3550·Published

Opinion

940 So.2d 1201 (2006)

Jeromy J. BAUTZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D06-3550.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 25, 2006.

*1202 Jeromy J. Bautz, Arcadia, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant filing a motion in the circuit court that includes the oath required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this opinion or the time remaining for such a motion under rule 3.850, whichever comes later.

GUNTHER, WARNER and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BAUTZ v. State, 940 So. 2d 1201, 2006 WL 3018002 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

940 So. 2d 1201 (BAUTZ v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.