Catlin v. State
This text of 929 So. 2d 1087 (Catlin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Reginald CATLIN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Reginald Catlin, Miami, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
*1088 PER CURIAM.
The denial of Appellant's rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed, without prejudice to raise the claim of a violation of the plea agreement in a legally sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Cowart v. State, 749 So.2d 506 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Lee v. State, 637 So.2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
STEVENSON, C.J., STONE and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
929 So. 2d 1087, 2006 WL 1006384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catlin-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.