Catlin v. State

929 So. 2d 1087, 2006 WL 1006384
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 2006·No. 4D06-750·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

929 So.2d 1087 (2006)

Reginald CATLIN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D06-750.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 19, 2006.

Reginald Catlin, Miami, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

*1088 PER CURIAM.

The denial of Appellant's rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed, without prejudice to raise the claim of a violation of the plea agreement in a legally sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Cowart v. State, 749 So.2d 506 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Lee v. State, 637 So.2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

STEVENSON, C.J., STONE and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Catlin v. State, 929 So. 2d 1087, 2006 WL 1006384 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

929 So. 2d 1087 (Catlin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bautz v. State
932 So. 2d 465 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)