Lazzari v. Village of Bronxville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lazzari v. Village of Bronxville

228 A.D.2d 652, 646 N.Y.2d 13, 646 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7511

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 228 A.D.2d 652 (Lazzari v. Village of Bronxville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lazzari v. Village of Bronxville, 228 A.D.2d 652, 646 N.Y.2d 13, 646 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7511 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff alleged that she was injured when she tripped [653]*653and fell on a passageway that led between two buildings from the street to a Village of Bronxville (hereinafter the Village) parking lot located behind the buildings. The Village moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to allege and prove that the Village had been given prior written notice of the alleged defect.

Pursuant to Village Law § 6-628, prior written notice is a condition precedent to maintaining an action against the Village arising from a sidewalk defect (see, Tyschak v Incorporated Vil. of Westbury, 193 AD2d 670). Contrary to the plaintiff’s argument, the passageway involved herein falls within the scope of the prior written notice provisions of the statute. This Court has previously "held that provisions similar to the one at bar cover any walkways over which the public has a general right of passage” (Rivers v City of New Rochelle, 178 AD2d 467; also see, Schneid v City of White Plains, 150 AD2d 549; Kadlecik v Village of Endicott, 174 AD2d 923; Mendes v Whitney-Floral Realty Corp., 216 AD2d 540). Since the plaintiff has failed to allege or show that the Village had received prior written notice of the alleged defect, the complaint was properly dismissed insofar as asserted against the Village (see, Giganti v Town of Hempstead, 186 AD2d 627; Mollahan v Village of Port Washington N., 153 AD2d 881).

We have examined the appellants’ remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff alleged that she was injured when she tripped [653]*653and fell on a passageway that led between two buildings from the street to a Village of Bronxville (hereinafter the Village) parking lot located behind the buildings. The Village moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to allege and prove that the Village had been given prior written notice of the alleged defect.

Pursuant to Village Law § 6-628, prior written notice is a condition precedent to maintaining an action against the Village arising from a sidewalk defect (see, Tyschak v Incorporated Vil. of Westbury, 193 AD2d 670). Contrary to the plaintiff’s argument, the passageway involved herein falls within the scope of the prior written notice provisions of the statute. This Court has previously "held that provisions similar to the one at bar cover any walkways over which the public has a general right of passage” (Rivers v City of New Rochelle, 178 AD2d 467; also see, Schneid v City of White Plains, 150 AD2d 549; Kadlecik v Village of Endicott, 174 AD2d 923; Mendes v Whitney-Floral Realty Corp., 216 AD2d 540). Since the plaintiff has failed to allege or show that the Village had received prior written notice of the alleged defect, the complaint was properly dismissed insofar as asserted against the Village (see, Giganti v Town of Hempstead, 186 AD2d 627; Mollahan v Village of Port Washington N., 153 AD2d 881).

We have examined the appellants’ remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 A.D.2d 652, 646 N.Y.2d 13, 646 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lazzari-v-village-of-bronxville-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack