Lazo Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Lazo Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company

DecidedJune 2, 2016

Docket05-14-01060-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Lazo Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company (Lazo Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lazo Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

FILE COPY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS -- -- -- --

NO. 16-0122

LAZO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., W&R TECHNOLOGY LLC D/B/A ATS SOUTH D/B/A ADVANCED § TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS SOUTH § AND EDDIE HILL D/B/A HILL Dallas County, § PROFESSIONAL SERVICES § v. 5th District. § HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, § GARRETT GOETERS, DAN WAMPLER, SHEARRARD THOMAS AND DOES 1-5

April 22, 2016

Petitioners' petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under the date shown. It is further ordered that petitioners, LAZO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., W&R TECHNOLOGY LLC D/B/A ATS SOUTH D/B/A ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS SOUTH AND EDDIE HILL D/B/A HILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, pay all costs incurred on this petition. WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this the 2nd day of June, 2016.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FILE COPY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS -- -- -- --

NO. 16-0122

LAZO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., W&R TECHNOLOGY LLC D/B/A ATS SOUTH D/B/A ADVANCED § TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS SOUTH § AND EDDIE HILL D/B/A HILL Dallas County, § PROFESSIONAL SERVICES § v. 5th District. § HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, § GARRETT GOETERS, DAN WAMPLER, SHEARRARD THOMAS AND DOES 1-5

April 22, 2016

Petitioners' petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under the date shown. It is further ordered that petitioners, LAZO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., W&R TECHNOLOGY LLC D/B/A ATS SOUTH D/B/A ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS SOUTH AND EDDIE HILL D/B/A HILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, pay all costs incurred on this petition. WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this the 2nd day of June, 2016.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Lazo Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lazo-technologies-inc-v-hewlett-packard-company-texapp-2016.