Lazo Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 25, 2014·No. 05-14-01060-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered December 23, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01060-CV

LAZO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL., Appellants V.

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-06786-D

ORDER

We GRANT the December 10, 2014 motion of Walter Steimel, Jr. with the law firm of

Loeb & Loeb LLP to withdraw as counsel for appellants. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to substitute Perry Cockerell with the law firm of Ankerson, Hauder & Bezney, P.C. as counsel for appellants.

We GRANT appellants’ December 18, 2014 motion for leave to file an amended brief.

Appellants shall file an amended brief by DECEMBER 31, 2014. Appellees’ brief will be due THIRTY DAYS after appellants’ amended brief is filed.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lazo Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Lazo Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company (Lazo Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.