Lazo Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company
This text of Lazo Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company (Lazo Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered February 26, 2015
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01060-CV
LAZO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL., Appellants
V.
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, ET AL., Appellees
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-06786-D
ORDER We GRANT the February 12, 2015 motion of nonresident attorney, Patricia M. Hamill,
for admission pro hac vice. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to add Patricia M. Hamill as
counsel pro hac vice.
We GRANT the February 12, 2015 motion of nonresident attorney, Deborah J.
Krabbendam, for admission pro hac vice. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to add Deborah
J. Krabbendam as counsel pro hac vice.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lazo Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lazo-technologies-inc-v-hewlett-packard-company-texapp-2015.