Home/Supreme Court/Lawlor Et Al., Trading as Independent Poster Exchange, v. National Screen Service Corp.

Lawlor Et Al., Trading as Independent Poster Exchange, v. National Screen Service Corp.

352 U.S. 992, 1 L. Ed. 2d 540, 77 S. Ct. 526, 1957 U.S. LEXIS 1751
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 25, 1957·No. 632·Published·Cited by 31 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam:

We agree with the Court of Appeals that the motion for summary judgment should have been denied. However, in our view, this disposition of the case made it unnecessary for the Court of Appeals to pass on any other issue than that of the per se invalidity of exclusive contracts under the Sherman Act. In order that the District Court not be bound by the consideration the Court of Appeals gave to the remaining issues, and without reaching any of the same, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari, vacate the judgments, and remand the cause to the District Court for trial.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter, with whom Mr. Justice Burton and Mr. Justice Harlan join, has filed a dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawlor Et Al., Trading as Independent Poster Exchange, v. National Screen Service Corp., 352 U.S. 992, 1 L. Ed. 2d 540, 77 S. Ct. 526, 1957 U.S. LEXIS 1751 (1957).

352 U.S. 992 (Lawlor Et Al., Trading as Independent Poster Exchange, v. National Screen Service Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Arturo Castellanos
716 F.3d 828 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)
Teleco, Inc. v. Ford Industries, Inc.
1978 OK 159 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1978)
Sound Ship Building Corp v. Bethlehem Steel Company (Incorporated)
533 F.2d 96 (Third Circuit, 1976)
Corp v. Bethlehem Steel Co.
533 F.2d 96 (Third Circuit, 1976)
Metro Cable Co. v. CATV of Rockford, Inc.
375 F. Supp. 350 (N.D. Illinois, 1974)
The Elder-Beerman Stores Corp. v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.
459 F.2d 138 (Sixth Circuit, 1972)
Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd.
416 F.2d 71 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)
Joseph E. Seagram and Sons, Inc., and the House of Seagram, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke and Liquors, Ltd., McKesson and Robbins, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke and Liquors, Ltd., Barton Distilling Company v. Hawaiian Oke and Liquors, Ltd.
416 F.2d 71 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)
United States ex rel. Campbell v. Rundle
327 F.2d 153 (Third Circuit, 1964)
United States v. Rundle
327 F.2d 153 (Third Circuit, 1964)
Lapierre v. Federated Plans, Inc.
195 F. Supp. 407 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1961)
Delval Motors, Inc. v. Oldsmobile Division, General Motors Corp.
193 F. Supp. 697 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1961)
PAC Construction Co. v. New York Factors, Inc.
191 F. Supp. 643 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1961)
Mullaly v. Carlisle Chemical Works, Inc.
184 F. Supp. 701 (D. New Jersey, 1960)
Francis G. Bragen v. Hudson County News Company, Inc
278 F.2d 615 (Third Circuit, 1960)
Reliable Volkswagen Sales & Service Co. v. World-Wide Automobile Corp.
182 F. Supp. 412 (D. New Jersey, 1960)
Walt Disney Productions v. American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc.
180 F. Supp. 113 (S.D. New York, 1960)
Mollie Krieger v. Ownership Corporation, a Corporation of New Jersey
270 F.2d 265 (Third Circuit, 1959)
Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corporation
270 F.2d 146 (Third Circuit, 1959)
Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.
270 F.2d 146 (Third Circuit, 1959)