Laski v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Laski v. State

96 A.D.2d 723, 465 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19296

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 11, 1983

DocketClaim No. 63307

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 A.D.2d 723 (Laski v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Laski v. State, 96 A.D.2d 723, 465 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19296 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum:" Claimant was injured on July 8, 1979 when the “S” hook which attached the seat to the chain of a swing in Letchworth State Park disengaged from the chain while she was swinging. An inspection by the State on May 30,1979 and by claimant before her use revealed no apparent defect in the swing. After a trial the Court of Claims determined that the State was not negligent and dismissed the claim. Claimant’s argument that the Court of Claims erred in refusing to apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur and to infer negligence by the State is unavailing. We hold that the result would not be different if res ipsa loquitur, applied. “The rule of res ipsa loquitur, where it applies, relieves a plaintiff from the necessity for specifying the particular negligence of defendant (out of the many possible causes) which led to the occurrence.” (Koch v Melton Realty Corp., 52 AD2d 773, 774; see, also, Abbott v Page Airways, 23 NY2d 502, 512-513). Here, the State may not be liable unless it had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous or defective condition of the swing (see Brooks v New York State Thruway Auth., 73 AD2d 767,768, affd 51 NY2d 892; cf. Harris v Village of East Hills, 41 NY2d 446, 450; see, generally, 4B Warren’s Negligence, Parks and Playgrounds, §§ 1.02, 2.01). The Court of Claims found that the State had no such notice and this finding is reasonable and fully supported by the evidence. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims, Moriarty, J. — negligence.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum:" Claimant was injured on July 8, 1979 when the “S” hook which attached the seat to the chain of a swing in Letchworth State Park disengaged from the chain while she was swinging. An inspection by the State on May 30,1979 and by claimant before her use revealed no apparent defect in the swing. After a trial the Court of Claims determined that the State was not negligent and dismissed the claim. Claimant’s argument that the Court of Claims erred in refusing to apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur and to infer negligence by the State is unavailing. We hold that the result would not be different if res ipsa loquitur, applied. “The rule of res ipsa loquitur, where it applies, relieves a plaintiff from the necessity for specifying the particular negligence of defendant (out of the many possible causes) which led to the occurrence.” (Koch v Melton Realty Corp., 52 AD2d 773, 774; see, also, Abbott v Page Airways, 23 NY2d 502, 512-513). Here, the State may not be liable unless it had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous or defective condition of the swing (see Brooks v New York State Thruway Auth., 73 AD2d 767,768, affd 51 NY2d 892; cf. Harris v Village of East Hills, 41 NY2d 446, 450; see, generally, 4B Warren’s Negligence, Parks and Playgrounds, §§ 1.02, 2.01). The Court of Claims found that the State had no such notice and this finding is reasonable and fully supported by the evidence. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims, Moriarty, J. — negligence.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 723, 465 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laski-v-state-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack