Brooks v. New York State Thruway Authority
This text of 415 N.E.2d 963 (Brooks v. New York State Thruway Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The experts for both sides testified that the hole in the highway was neither of the size nor the depth to deflect the tire of the claimants’ vehicle. Nor was there evidence that striking the hole would produce any bump or condition which would cause the driver to lose control of the vehicle. The evidence was insufficient to establish a casual relationship between the State’s alleged negligence in failing to repair the pothole and the accident in this case. Although there was some testimony that the accident could have been caused by an attempt to avoid the pothole a conclusion that this had in fact occurred would be speculative on this record.
*894 With this uncertainty as to causation, it must be concluded that the claimants have failed in their proof.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
415 N.E.2d 963, 51 N.Y.2d 892, 434 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-new-york-state-thruway-authority-ny-1980.