Holland v. County of Monroe

126 A.D.2d 975, 511 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42096
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 23, 1987·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Order affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff Judith Holland sustained injuries when struck by a branch which fell from a tree on property owned by defendant county. The county has a duty to maintain trees on its property and to establish reasonable inspection procedures to detect dangerous conditions (see, Harris v Village of E. Hills, 41 NY2d 446, 448; Diamond v State of New York, 53 AD2d 958, appeal dismissed 40 NY2d 969). Questions of fact being [976]*976present as to the existence of a reasonable inspection procedure and defendant’s actual or constructive notice of this dangerous condition, summary judgment was properly denied.

All concur, except Doerr and Boomer, JJ., who dissent and vote to reverse and grant the motion in the following memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holland v. County of Monroe, 126 A.D.2d 975, 511 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

126 A.D.2d 975 (Holland v. County of Monroe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Opn. No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 2011
Hilliard v. Town of Greenburgh
301 A.D.2d 572 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)