Larry K. Alexander v. Mary Jensen-Carter
This text of 44 F. App'x 32 (Larry K. Alexander v. Mary Jensen-Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Larry Kenneth Alexander appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (BAP’s) order affirming the bankruptcy court’s 1 denial of his motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) and 11 U.S.C. § 105. Alexander also has moved to strike appellee’s addendum and portions of appellee’s brief.
Alexander’s Rule 60(b) motion sought relief from a June 1999 bankruptcy court decision disallowing his claimed homestead exemption, which the BAP and Eighth Circuit affirmed. We conclude the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in denying Alexander relief. See In re Zimmerman, 869 F.2d 1126, 1127-28 (8th Cir. 1989) (standard of review); Klein v. Arkoma Prod. Co., 73 F.3d 779, 784 (8th Cir.) (under law-of-case doctrine, every question which appellate court has disposed of by decree is finally settled and determined, and district court is bound to carry decree into execution according to mandate), cert, denied, 519 U.S. 815, 117 S.Ct. 65, 136 L.Ed.2d 27 (1996); Baker Elec. Co-op., Inc. v. Chaske, 28 F.3d 1466, 1475 (8th Cir.1994); Ins. Corp. of Ireland, Ltd. v. Compagnie des Bauxites de Guinee, 456 U.S. 694, 702 n. 9, 102 S.Ct. 2099, 72 L.Ed.2d 492 (1982). We also deny Alexander’s motion to strike.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Dennis D. O’Brien, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 F. App'x 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-k-alexander-v-mary-jensen-carter-ca8-2002.