Lane v. Pipeline Construction Co.
222 So. 2d 19, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2322
Opinions
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 4, 1969.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is, therefore, denied.
Petitioner’s application for attorney’s fees is also denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lane v. Pipeline Construction Co., 222 So. 2d 19, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2322 (Fla. 1969).
222 So. 2d 19 (Lane v. Pipeline Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lane v. Pipeline Construction Co.
246 So. 2d 742 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)