Lane v. Pipeline Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Lane v. Pipeline Construction Co.

222 So. 2d 19, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2322

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 23, 1969

DocketNo. 38340

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 222 So. 2d 19 (Lane v. Pipeline Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lane v. Pipeline Construction Co., 222 So. 2d 19, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2322 (Fla. 1969).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 4, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

Petitioner’s application for attorney’s fees is also denied.

ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur. ERVIN, C. J., dissents with Opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI