Lane v. Pipeline Construction Co.

246 So. 2d 742, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3878
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 8, 1971
DocketNo. 39851
StatusPublished

This text of 246 So. 2d 742 (Lane v. Pipeline Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lane v. Pipeline Construction Co., 246 So. 2d 742, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3878 (Fla. 1971).

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on Petition for Writ of Certiorari upon the transcript of record and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, to review the order of the Industrial Relations Commission in said cause, it is ordered that said Petition be and the same is hereby denied.

It is further ordered that the petitioner’s petition for allowance of attorney’s fees, be and the same is hereby denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ball v. Mann
75 So. 2d 758 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
Arnold v. Stroud
221 So. 2d 729 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)
Lane v. Pipeline Construction Co.
222 So. 2d 19 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 So. 2d 742, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-pipeline-construction-co-fla-1971.