Holloway v. Curcie Bros., Inc.

203 So. 2d 499, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3441
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 7, 1967
DocketNo. 35976
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 203 So. 2d 499 (Holloway v. Curcie Bros., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holloway v. Curcie Bros., Inc., 203 So. 2d 499, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3441 (Fla. 1967).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 24, 1966.

After oral argument and upon consideration of the petition, the record and briefs, we conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied. The motion for attorney’s fees filed by Petitioner Holloway is denied.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur. THORNAL, C. J., dissents on authority of Evans v. Florida Industrial Commission, Fla., 196 So.2d 748.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Luttrell v. Roger Holler Chevrolet
625 So. 2d 921 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
ESCAMBIA CTY. COUNCIL v. Goldsmith
500 So. 2d 626 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Escambia County Council v. Goldsmith
465 So. 2d 655 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Barile Excavation and Pipeline Sewer Improvement v. Hough
417 So. 2d 843 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Lane v. Pipeline Construction Co.
222 So. 2d 19 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 So. 2d 499, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holloway-v-curcie-bros-inc-fla-1967.