Lambert v. State
This text of 432 S.W.2d 902 (Lambert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Appellant was convicted, upon his plea of nolo contendere and waiver of trial by jury, of the offense of burglary and his punishment assessed at confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections for a term of three years.
Appellant’s sole contention on appeal is that the indictment is fundamentally defective because it did not allege all of the essential elements of the offense of burglary, as denounced by any of the three articles: 1389, 1390, and 1391 of the Penal Code.
The indictment contains allegations similar to those in the indictment which this court held sufficient to charge the offense of burglary in Lambert v. State, 432 S.W.2d 901, this day affirmed.
The contention is overruled.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
432 S.W.2d 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lambert-v-state-texcrimapp-1968.