Lambert v. State

432 S.W.2d 902
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lambert v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1968 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1102
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 23, 1968·No. No. 41644·Published

Opinion

OPINION

DICE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted, upon his plea of nolo contendere and waiver of trial by jury, of the offense of burglary and his punishment assessed at confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections for a term of three years.

Appellant’s sole contention on appeal is that the indictment is fundamentally defective because it did not allege all of the essential elements of the offense of burglary, as denounced by any of the three articles: 1389, 1390, and 1391 of the Penal Code.

The indictment contains allegations similar to those in the indictment which this court held sufficient to charge the offense of burglary in Lambert v. State, 432 S.W.2d 901, this day affirmed.

The contention is overruled.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lambert v. State, 432 S.W.2d 902 (Tex. 1968).

432 S.W.2d 902 (Lambert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lambert v. State
432 S.W.2d 901 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)