LAFFIT PINCAY, JR. CHRISTOPHER J. MCCARRON, — v. VINCENT S. ANDREWS ROBERT ANDREWS VINCENT ANDREW MANAGEMENT CORP., —

Ninth Circuit

LAFFIT PINCAY, JR. CHRISTOPHER J. MCCARRON, — v. VINCENT S. ANDREWS ROBERT ANDREWS VINCENT ANDREW MANAGEMENT CORP., —

367 F.3d 1087, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8973

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 7, 2004

Docket02-56577

StatusPublished

This text of 367 F.3d 1087 (LAFFIT PINCAY, JR. CHRISTOPHER J. MCCARRON, — v. VINCENT S. ANDREWS ROBERT ANDREWS VINCENT ANDREW MANAGEMENT CORP., —) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

LAFFIT PINCAY, JR. CHRISTOPHER J. MCCARRON, — v. VINCENT S. ANDREWS ROBERT ANDREWS VINCENT ANDREW MANAGEMENT CORP., —, 367 F.3d 1087, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8973 (9th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

367 F.3d 1087

Laffit PINCAY, Jr.; Christopher J. McCarron, Plaintiffs — Appellants,
v.
Vincent S. ANDREWS; Robert Andrews; Vincent Andrew Management Corp., Defendants — Appellees.

No. 02-56577.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 7, 2004.

Neil Papiano, Patrick McAdam, Iverson, Yoakum, Papiano & Hatch, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Andrew W. Hayes, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, Armonk, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI