Lacy v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

600 F. App'x 127
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 21, 2015
DocketNo. 15-1013
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 600 F. App'x 127 (Lacy v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lacy v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., 600 F. App'x 127 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alvia L. Lacy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lacy v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., No. 1:14-ev-00179-RDB (D.Md. Dec. 8, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
600 F. App'x 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacy-v-national-railroad-passenger-corp-ca4-2015.