Lacey v. Sure Shot Books Publishers LLC

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 9, 2024·No. 1:24-cv-02406·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN JAY LACEY, Plaintiff, 24-CV-2406 (LTS) -against- ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATION SURE SHOT BOOKS PUBLISHERS LLC, Defendant. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff was incarcerated at the Indiana State Reformatory when he filed this complaint, but he is currently incarcerated at the Plainfield Correctional Facility (“Plainfield”) in Plainfield, Indiana. He is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”). By order dated May 28, 2024, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and granted him 30 days’ leave to replead his claims in an amended complaint. The Court did not receive an amended complaint from Plaintiff, and by order dated August 22, 2024, the Court entered judgment. The Court has now received a letter from Plaintiff seeking reconsideration of the dismissal of the action on the ground that he was transferred to Plainfield on May 8, 2024, and never received the May 28, 2024 order. (ECF 13.) The Court construes this application as a motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants the motion for reconsideration and directs Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 45 days of the date of this order. DISCUSSION Upon opening this new action, the Clerk’s Office docketed the court’s March 18, 2024 Standing Order, directing all self-represented litigants to inform the court of each change of address or electronic contact information. See In Re: Cases Filed By Pro Se Plaintiffs, This Matter Relates To: Duty of Self-Represented Parties to Keep Address Information Current, No. 24-MC-127 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2024) (“ Standing Order” ). That order was mailed to Plaintiff on April 1, 2024.

By order dated May 28, 2024, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and granted him 30 days’ leave to replead his claims in an amended complaint. That order was mailed to Plaintiff on May 30, 2024, and it was not returned to the court as undeliverable. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint as directed. He now seeks reconsideration of the dismissal of the action on the ground that he was transferred to Plainfield on May 8, 2024, and never received the May 28, 2024 order. (ECF 13.) Under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may seek relief from a district court’s order or judgment for the following reasons:

(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b); (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an opposing party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged; it is based on an earlier judgment that has been reversed or vacated; or applying it prospectively is no longer equitable; or (6) any other reason justifying relief. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Plaintiff failed to comply with the Standing Order requiring him to inform the court of any change of address. Plaintiff nevertheless has promptly sought relief from judgment. The Court concludes that there has been excusable neglect and grants Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. Within 45 days from the date of this order, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint showing that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction of this matter. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within the time allowed, the Court will dismiss the action. No further extensions of time will be granted. Plaintiff is reminded that he must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and that the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. CONCLUSION Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF 13) is granted. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to vacate the order of dismissal and the civil judgment (ECF 11-12). Within 45 days of

receiving this order, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint showing that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction of this matter. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within the time allowed, the Court will dismiss the action. An Amended Complaint form is attached to this order. No further extensions of time will be granted. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 9, 2024 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Civ. (i)

(In the space above enter the full name(s) of the plaintiff(s).) AMENDED COMPLAINT -against- Jury Trial: O Yes oO No ee (check one)

(dn the space above enter the full name(s) of the defendant(s). Ifyou cannot fit the names of all of the defendants in the space provided, please write “see attached” in the space above and attach an additional sheet of paper with the full list of names. The names listed in the above caption must be identical to those contained in Part I. Addresses should not be included here.)

I. Parties in this complaint: A. List your name, address and telephone number. If you are presently in custody, include your identification number and the name and address of your current place of confinement. Do the same for any additional plaintiffs named. Attach additional sheets of paper as necessary. Plaintiff Name Street Address ee County, City. State& ZipCode Telephone Number eee B. List all defendants. You should state the full name of the defendant, even if that defendant is a government agency, an organization, a corporation, or an individual. Include the address where each defendant may be served. Make sure that the defendant(s) listed below are identical to those contained in the above caption. Attach additional sheets of paper as necessary.

Rev. 12/2009

Street Address _______________________________________________________ County, City _________________________________________________________ State & Zip Code ____________________________________________________ Telephone Number ____________________________________________________ Defendant No. 2 Name ___________________________________________________________ Street Address _______________________________________________________ County, City _________________________________________________________ State & Zip Code ____________________________________________________ Telephone Number ____________________________________________________ Defendant No. 3 Name ___________________________________________________________ Street Address _______________________________________________________ County, City _________________________________________________________ State & Zip Code ____________________________________________________ Telephone Number ____________________________________________________ Defendant No.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lacey v. Sure Shot Books Publishers LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Lacey v. Sure Shot Books Publishers LLC (Lacey v. Sure Shot Books Publishers LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)