L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 877, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1908
United States Customs Court·Decided April 3, 1967·No. No. P67/92; protest 65/20039 (New York)·Published

Opinion

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of household utensils (battery-operated mixers) similar in all material respects to those the subject of F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 231, Abstract 68674), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 877, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1908 (cusc 1967).

58 Cust. Ct. 877 (L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States
53 Cust. Ct. 231 (U.S. Customs Court, 1964)