L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1026, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1908
United States Customs Court·Decided March 26, 1968·No. No. P68/177; protests 66/12101, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Nao, G.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of battery-operated mixers similar in all material respects to those the subject of F.B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 231, Abstract 68674), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1026, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1908 (cusc 1968).

60 Cust. Ct. 1026 (L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warren Atlantic, Inc. v. United States
53 Cust. Ct. 231 (U.S. Customs Court, 1964)